The image above was created by the MidJourney‘s AI. It is a patently beautiful piece of digital art that immediately evokes the image of Sandro Boticelli’s The Birth of Venus. As soon as it was created, however, it inherited two of the current biggest questions surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) Art.
- The rights to the image or who gets to profit from the image.
- The ethics of the medium
What is AI?
AI art has been a hot topic in the world of art and technology in recent months. As AI technology continues to advance, more and more artists are turning to artificial intelligence as a tool to create their art. This has raised a number of ethical questions, including those related to the issue of copyright.
First, it’s important to define what is meant by AI art. In general, AI art refers to art that is created using artificial intelligence algorithms. This can include everything from paintings and drawings to music and videos. Some AI art is created entirely by algorithms, while other AI art is created by artists who use AI tools to help them create their work.
Copyright
Copyright is a type of intellectual property that protects original works of authorship as soon as an author fixes the work in a tangible form of expression. In copyright law, there are a lot of different types of works, including paintings, photographs, illustrations, musical compositions, sound recordings, computer programs, books, poems, blog posts, movies, architectural works, plays, and so much more.
Works are defined as original when they are independently created by a human author and have a minimal degree of creativity. Remember the case of a monkey that took a selfie? Yes it was ruled that since it was not of human creation, the photograph did not enjoy copyright protection.
Independent creation simply means that you create it yourself, without copying. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that, to be creative, a work must have a “spark” and “modicum” of creativity. Copyright protects the expression of an idea, not an idea itself.
A work is fixed when it is captured (either by or under the authority of an author) in a sufficiently permanent medium such that the work can be perceived, reproduced, or communicated for more than a short time. For example, a work is fixed when you write it down or record it.
Ethics of Copyright and AI Art
a) Ownership of the Art
One of the key ethical issues related to AI art and copyright is the question of ownership. Who owns the copyright to a piece of AI art? Is it the artist who created the AI algorithm, the artist who used the algorithm to create the art, or the algorithm itself? This question is not easily answered, as it raises a number of complex issues.
One potential solution to this problem is to recognize the AI algorithm as a co-author of the art. In this scenario, the artist who created the algorithm would be considered a co-author of the art, along with the artist who used the algorithm to create the art. This would ensure that both parties have a claim to the copyright of the art.
Another potential solution is to consider the AI algorithm as a tool, rather than a co-author. In this scenario, the artist who uses the algorithm to create the art would be considered the sole owner of the copyright. This approach is similar to how we currently treat other tools, such as paints and brushes, which are used by artists to create their art.
Both of these approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages. Recognizing the AI algorithm as a co-author would ensure that the creators of the algorithm are fairly compensated for their contribution to the art. However, it could also lead to complex legal battles over who has the right to use the algorithm, and how the profits from the sale of the art should be divided.
On the other hand, treating the AI algorithm as a tool would simplify the issue of ownership, as it would clearly establish the artist who uses the algorithm as the sole owner of the copyright. However, it could also potentially discourage the development of AI algorithms for artistic purposes, as creators of these algorithms would not have any financial incentive to share their work.
b) Question of Originality of the Art
Another ethical issue related to AI art and copyright is the question of originality. In order for a work to be protected by copyright, it must be considered “original” – that is, it must be the product of the artist’s own creative effort. But what does this mean in the context of AI art?
Some argue that AI algorithms are capable of producing truly original works of art, as they are not limited by the constraints of human creativity. In this view, AI art should be eligible for copyright protection just like any other art. Others, however, argue that AI art is not truly original, as it is ultimately the product of a human-designed algorithm. In this view, AI art should not be eligible for copyright protection. In addition, Many argue that AI-generated art lacks the unique perspective and creativity of human-made art, and therefore cannot be considered truly original.
Another issue is the potential for AI to be used to manipulate or copy existing works without permission. With the ability to quickly and easily analyse and replicate elements of a piece of art, AI could potentially be used for nefarious purposes, such as creating fake art or copying someone else’s work without their permission.
Complex Questions
This debate raises a number of complex questions about the nature of creativity and originality. On the one hand, it is clear that AI algorithms can produce art that is unlike anything that a human artist could create. On the other hand, it is also clear that these algorithms are ultimately the product of human design and ingenuity.
Ultimately, the question of whether AI art should be eligible for copyright protection is a difficult one, and there is no clear answer. It will likely depend on the specific circumstances of a given situation, such as the extent of human involvement in the creation of the artwork, the nature of the AI used, and the specific laws in the jurisdiction in which the artwork is produced.
In the end, the courts may have to decide the issue on a case-by-case basis. In general, copyright law is intended to protect the original expression of an author, and it is difficult to argue that a work created by a machine can meet this criteria. On the other hand, AI art can be incredibly complex and original in its own right, and there is an argument to be made that it should be eligible for the same protection as other forms of art.
That said, it is possible that AI art may be eligible for copyright protection in some cases, and it may become increasingly important for AI creators to seek legal advice in order to protect their work. This is an issue that will require a lot more research and debate before a definitive answer can be reached.
Recommendations
In the meantime, these questions and concerns highlight the need for ethical guidelines and regulations in the use of AI in the art world. As AI technology continues to advance, it is crucial for the art community to come together and establish clear rules and regulations to protect the rights of artists and ensure the integrity of the art industry.
Additionally, it is important for artists to consider the ethical implications of using AI in their own work. Whether using AI as a tool or creating AI-generated art, artists must take responsibility for the impact of their work and ensure that it aligns with their own values and ethics.
In conclusion, the use of AI in art raises important ethical questions and concerns. From the issue of originality to the potential for manipulation and infringement, the ethics of copyright in AI art is a complex and evolving topic.